Leave a Reply
About This Blog
At Operand, we design and develop interactive experiences for a living but we are also users of them. Throughout our daily lives we search for and use every digital experience we can find that we consider “interactive”. Our work and blog are founded on our somewhat unique view of what interactivity means. In brief, we think it's bigger and more expansive than most other people seem to. We have define six levels of interactivity and blog about digital interactive experiences within art, architecture, advertising, exhibits, and elsewhere that we feel succeed at elevating interactivity.
Previous Posts
- Intel Retail Digital Signage Concept
- Miele Inspirience Center
- MicroTiles Video Walls
- Medtronic HRS Conference Tables & Wall
- Multitouch Spheres
- iPhone Costumes
- Camille Utterback Interview
- 10/GUI Computing Paradigms
- Exploring the Sixth Sense
- Coffee Table as Universal Remote Control
Archives
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Sites We Like
- we make money not art
- interactive architecture
- your story alive
- NOTCOT
- psfk
- cube me
- ars technica
- TED
- smashing magazine
- toad stool
- machine thinking
- cool hunter
- sawse
- ad lab
- museum 2.0
Florence EyeStop Interactive Bus Stops
An interesting project has recently been developed by MIT’s SENSEable city lab, a research lab at the school dedicated to exploring a new approach to the way we understand and relate to urban environments.
Partnering with the city of Florence and ATAF, the agency that runs the metropolitan buses, the MIT researchers developed prototypes for a next-generation bus stop and bus shelter scheme that utilizes numerous interactive technologies to create a highly functional and contextual experience for riders while waiting for the bus to arrive.
The researchers specifically reference the interactivity of the iPhone and the intent to provide a similar level of interactivity within the bus stops themselves. The white paper talks about the intention to customize each bus stop to the local environment and the needs of the riders at that stop, but the stops seem to generally follow two basic form factors - the full shelter pictured above, and a more minimal stop indicator, as shown below.
These poles are the most adaptive element:
But beyond the form factors, the really cool stuff is in the interactive technolgies employed. Last month we blogged about a fun interactive marketing deployment here in New York that was retrofit into the existing MTA bus shelters. The EyeStop design, driven by an academic group and the municipality, focuses instead on functional features that can be useful to bus riders.
The poles and shelters display real-time information about how quickly the next bus will arrive, which is probably the most useful feature. And possibly the most challenging to implement. Each pole has a wifi and bluetooth antenna. I imagine that some kind of transmiters would also be required on every bus in order to communicate with each pole, but since all stops would be networked together, buses could be effectively triangulated in dense urban environments (for which EyeStop is targeted.) But that sort of tracking might not extensible to suburban settings.
While riders are waiting, EyeStop provides numerous interactive features, allowing riders to explore route maps, browse community message boards, and given the internet connectivity of the poles and shelters, any number of other information services could be offered, including of course centrally managed advertising (which the SENSEable lab folks do make room for, as shown below.)
An exciting innovation is the use of the e-ink technology instead of traditional screens. That’s probably vital to the viability of EyeStop, because e-ink can be brighter in sunlight and will eventually be far cheaper to deploy and run, since it requires very little power to run compared to an LCD screen. What power is required is mostly gathered via photovoltaic solar cells embedded within the post or shelter.
There’s also mention of mobile integration, allowing interactions from riders’ cell phones. Although from our experience, getting people to pair their mobile devices with digital installations is a fairly tough sell to the consumers themselves, who are rightly nervous about privacy. But possibly a large installed base by a trusted source like a municapility could overcome this resistance.
All-in-all, EyeStop is a pretty compelling vision of what bus stops could (and should?) be like in the not-too-distant future…
posted by josiah at 2:25 AM