Leave a Reply
About This Blog
At Operand, we design and develop interactive experiences for a living but we are also users of them. Throughout our daily lives we search for and use every digital experience we can find that we consider “interactive”. Our work and blog are founded on our somewhat unique view of what interactivity means. In brief, we think it's bigger and more expansive than most other people seem to. We have define six levels of interactivity and blog about digital interactive experiences within art, architecture, advertising, exhibits, and elsewhere that we feel succeed at elevating interactivity.
Previous Posts
- Intel Retail Digital Signage Concept
- Miele Inspirience Center
- MicroTiles Video Walls
- Medtronic HRS Conference Tables & Wall
- Multitouch Spheres
- iPhone Costumes
- Camille Utterback Interview
- 10/GUI Computing Paradigms
- Exploring the Sixth Sense
- Coffee Table as Universal Remote Control
Archives
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
Sites We Like
- we make money not art
- interactive architecture
- your story alive
- NOTCOT
- psfk
- cube me
- ars technica
- TED
- smashing magazine
- toad stool
- machine thinking
- cool hunter
- sawse
- ad lab
- museum 2.0
Inamo - An(other) Interactive Restaurant
Generally the clever use of interactive technologies by a brand serves predominantly a marketing function - increase the level of engagement that your customers have with your brand. But sometimes it can provide an operational efficency function as well. Think of airline ticket check-in kiosks. When you can implement technologies that both increase your sales AND decrease your cost of doing business then you’re building your ROI from both sides. Such is the promise of restaurant automation if executed well.
The restaurant business is one of the last bastions of the labor-intensive services sector. It’s still driven almost exclusively by good old fashioned manual labor. Sure, the adoption of front-of-house computer automation has increased efficiencies in recent years, but overall it’s still a fairly manual process. I should note that from our point of view, that’s a fairly good thing. What we evangelize here at Operand is interactivity. And despite what some think, interactivity is not synonymous with digital technologies. The process of talking to a waiter, maybe getting recommendations about what’s good, and perhaps exchanging some small talk, is a deeply interactive process. And if the waiter is doing his or her job properly, this interaction should engage the patron with the restaurant’s brand fairly deeply.
But the largest component of cost for just about any business, certainly for any service business, is the cost of their employees. That’s why people get laid off in recessions. So there is certainly a compelling financial case for restaurant automation if (and only if) it can be made as engaging as the conventional restaurant experience. And if you could manage to make it even more engaging, then that’s a double win. If nothing else, digital interactivity can offer restaurateurs the promise of a consistent customer experience.
Anyway, I say all that just to express my reasoning for why forward-thinking restaurants will continue to experiment with interactive experiences for diners. We’ve seen a number of really interesting examples of this already. Of course there was the interactive karaoke restaurant in Times Square that Operand developed and produced in 2007. There was the uWink restauraunt in Hollywood. And there was the Clo interactive wine bar, also here in New York. Add to that list Inamo.
Inamo is a pan-Asian restaurant in London that uses projection touch technology to present an interactive menu to patrons. In terms of technical execution then, it’s very much like Clo. In addition to ordering food using a menu projected onto the table, the interactivity developed for Inamo allows diners to customize their booth’s ambience by projecting virtual tablecloths and other elements. And perhaps they expect a lot of first dates at Inamo - you can even summon a cab to make a fast getaway.
Anyone who reads this blog even semi-regularly knows that we at Operand are extremely bullish on the future of touch surface technologies for public spaces of all kinds. It’s always nice to see emerging technologies like this employed in concert with a keen design sensibility, as has been done at Inamo. We’ll be watching with interest to see how all of these interactive restaurants perform in the marketplace. But whether they succeed or fail, we are certain that many more innovators will follow in their footsteps.
posted by josiah at 1:34 PM